RBC daily
(St.
Petersburg), February 28, 2008
A QUIET HARBOR, Denis Lebedev
THE
BUSINESS EDUCATION MARKET OF ST.
PETERSBURG IS AT A STAGE OF EVOLUTIONARY
DEVELOPMENT
The
established circle of the main players does not feel any serious competitive
pressure on the part of Moscow-based and foreign institutes yet. They prefer
either working in niche segments or not noticing the market of St. Petersburg at
all.
Not a
single representative of the educational business polled by RBC daily noticed
their serious influence on the situation and growth of prices by 10-15% in 2007
passed unnoticed for the enrollees not spoilt by high
competition.
Despite the
sufficiently high profitability of the business programs (see the round table on
pages 30-31), large foreign ÌÂÀ brands do not hurry to open their campuses in
St. Petersburg.
On the one hand, the top schools are very conservative in general, on the other
hand, increase of qualification and growth of an employee inside of a St.
Petersburg-based company requires a special approach of professors impossible
without taking of local specific into account. Anastasia Korshunova, Deputy
Director for International Development of Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School
- Campus St.Petersburg, comments, "As a rule, West European and American schools
that come to the Russian market offer education in long-term (starting from one
year) programs in European countries and in the US.
Target groups of such business schools and the schools offering education in
Russia differ from each other very
much. That is why it is hardly possible to speak about tightening of competition
due to coming of foreign players of the market."
Valentin
Galenko, Director of the Higher School of Economics of the SPbGUEF, says "If
foreign business schools wish to be on our educational market they will need
time to understand the educational needs of companies and to create the relevant
programs. Along with this, they will hardly do without attraction of experience
of our lecturers. In my opinion, joint programs will always be competitive under
condition of good preparatory joint work. With regard to the business schools
from other cities, only Moscow is a competitor
for St.
Petersburg so far. However, the level of the best
business schools of Moscow and St. Petersburg is
approximately similar. The markets of business education of Moscow and St.
Petersburg are also large enough for bitter competition."
Along with this, such situation has been registered in the last few years and
seems to be quite stable. Dmitry Pavlov, Pro-Rector for Development and Foreign
Relations of the IMISP, presumes, "80-95% of the audience of the city is
oriented at offers of traditional local players." Alexei Popov,
Director of ÅÌÂÀ General Management programs of the Stockholm School of
Economics, says, "Nothing is heard yet about coming of some new loud names to
St. Petersburg.
Meanwhile, all leading players do not stand still, are developing their products
actively and competition exerts its positive influence."
WITHOUT
DISTRACTION FROM THE JOB
The
St. Petersburg
model of education practically accomplished its formation and did not undergo
serious changes for a few years in succession.
Anastasia
Korshunova remarks, "The local market of business education is filled mostly
with offers of modular/full-time-correspondence and afternoon formats of
education. This trend is directly connected with the labor market and
practically zero level of unemployment. Very few acting managers are ready to
interrupt the work record for 12-18 months for education in a day program. The
employer is also hardly prepared to finance (fully or partially) education of
employees in a day program with full distraction from the job." Nadezhda
Golitsyna from Open Business School agrees that day education is almost not
demanded in St.
Petersburg still. Golitsyna is convinced, "Although all
accredited remote programs have a full-time component to this or that extent,
the quantity of those who can study full-time is insignificant in our city and
in the country yet."
The polled
business schools of St.
Petersburg speak about the trends having opposite
directions in formation of the profile of an average student of MBA programs in
the city. For instance, representatives of Vlerik point at growth of the average
age by one or two years to 33 years. On the contrary, representatives of the
Higher School of Economics speak about rejuvenation. Although representatives of
the IMISP admit that the average age of students changes very little lately
(33.5 years), they also point at coming of a new generation of managers born in
the 1980s and whose first experience of work has been gained already after the
crisis of 1998. The ratio of students who pay for education on their own and
students for whom the employer pays differs in different way in various schools.
The reason is that all schools have different approaches to attraction of
clients. Whereas some schools stake at direct work with managers, some others
strengthen their positions in the corporate segment. The latter start offering
more comprehensive services to companies. Valentin Galenko reported, "Cases when
companies order consulting services with support in the form of programs for
improvement of qualification, training etc grow more
frequent."
Along with this, all business
schools also point at growth in the competence of the enrollees both in the
managerial aspect and in the initial training. For instance, the quantity of
students who cannot study in the English language decreases permanently. Growth
of the quantity of students who study at expense of their companies corresponds
also to growth in well-being of the top managers who are ready to pay for their
education on their own, say representatives of the Stockholm School. The crediting programs of banks that develop
on the wave of the consumer boom in St.
Petersburg allow the students to pay for their education
more often. In any case, so far it is difficult for Russian banks to compete
against offers of foreign financial entities oriented at crediting of Western
programs. In Europe and America, it is possible to draw a
credit for education at 2-3% a year and majority of Russian banks do not single
out educational crediting into a separate business line yet to the extent
enabling them to offer serious interest discounts. Interestingly, the business
schools of the city call the Russian branch of foreign bank BSVG the leader of
the market of crediting of education. Anastasia Korshunova complains,
"Percentage of the students who pay for education on credits of banks is very
small and, unfortunately, does not grow annually. On average, it is not bigger
than 5% of all students."
INSENSITIVE
Growth in
prices of programs of business schools by 10-15% on average is expected in 2008
like in 2008. Along with this, management programs traditionally cost more than
marketing programs along with the same volume of classes and timeframe.
Anastasia Korshunova reports, "The target audience is not sensitive to growth of
the price, which is primarily explained by growth in the quantity of the
students who receive financial support of the employers and, of course, by
growth in incomes of the population." In general, the market of business schools
of the city oriented mostly at the internal demand is far from saturation and
appearance of really serious competition yet. For obtaining of the standard of
education demanded in the West it is necessary to go abroad. The local schools
already formed the mains standards of the St. Petersburg level of the quality of
knowledge suitable exactly for the local specific of business processes. Changes
may start only from a new generation of professors and managers of the schools.
Pavlov says, "The overall situation on the Russian market of business education
is characterized by change of generations both among lecturers and among
managers of the schools. This process will determine development of the industry
in the next five to ten years and competitiveness of a separate business school
in the long term will depend on successful (directed, regulated etc) course of
the process in such business school in the short term. This is not a secret that
majority of both lecturers and managers of the main market players has been
formed in the Soviet educational environment and the age of majority of starts
is more than 50 or even 60 years old. In my opinion, creation of technologies
and tools for transfer of professional skills and delegation of power represent
the vector of changes of today."
***
Valentin
Galenko, Director of the Higher School of Economics of the
SPbGUEF:
"Cases when
companies order consulting services with support in the form of programs for
improvement of qualification, training etc grow more frequent."